# Comparisons in Multivariate Settings

# 10.4. Comparisons in Multivariate Settings¶

When we examine a distribution or relationship, we often want to compare it across subgroups of the data. This process of conditioning on additional factors often leads to visualizations that involve three or more variables. In this section, we explain how to read plots that are commonly used to visualize multiple variables.

As an example, in the scatter plot below, we compare the relationship between height and longevity across repetition categories. We collapsed repetition (the typical number of times it takes for a dog to learn a new command) from six categories into four: <15, 15-25, 25-40, and 40+. Now each group has about 30 breeds in it, and having fewer categories makes it easier to decipher relationships.

```
rep_replacements = {
'80-100': '40+', '40-80': '40+',
'<5': '<15', '5-15': '<15',
}
dogs = dogs.assign(
repetition=dogs['repetition'].replace(rep_replacements))
```

These categories are conveyed by different shaped symbols in the scatter plot below.

This plot would be challenging to interpret if there were
more levels within the `repetition`

feature.

Next, we address plotting techniques that help make comparisons and uncover structure in three or more features.

- Combinations Across Groups
When we examine relationships between qualitative features, we examine proportions of one feature within subgroups defined by another. In the previous section, the three line plots in one figure and the side-by-side bar plots both display such comparisons. With three (or more) qualitative features, we can continue to subdivide the data according to the combinations of levels of the features and compare these proportions using line plots, dot charts, side-by-side bar charts, etc. But, these plots tend to get increasingly difficult to understand with further subdivisions.

- Panels of Scatter Plots
The previous scatter plot shows how to use different symbols to represent qualitative features. These distinctions enable us to examine the relationship between three variables (2 quantitative and 1 qualitative). Another technique for examining these multi-variable relationships is to make a grid of conditional plots, also called

*facets*.

The facet plot below is one example; each of the four scatter plots shows the relationship between longevity and height for a different range of repetitions. By separating scatter plots, we can assess how the relationship between two quantitative values changes across the subgroups. And, we can more easily see the range of height and longevity for each repetition range.

```
px.scatter(dogs.dropna(subset=['repetition']),
x='height', y='longevity',
facet_col='repetition', facet_col_wrap=2,
trendline='ols', width=450, height=400)
```

We can see that the larger breeds tend to have shorter lifespans. Another interesting feature is that the lines are similar in slope, but the line for the 40+ repetitions sits about 1.5 years below the others. Those breeds tend to live about 1.5 years less on average than the other repetition categories no matter the height.

Small multiples of plots like this one are convenient because they let us see whether the relationship between two quantitative features holds across groups.

- Groups and Subgroups of Box Plots
We have seen in the collections of box plots of height according to breed size that we can compare the basic shape of a distribution across subgroups with side-by-side box plots. When we have two or more qualitative features, we can organize the box plots into groups according to one of the qualitative features.

- Curse of Dimensionality
Comparisons that involve more than one categorical variable can quickly become cumbersome as the number of possible combinations of categories grows. For example, there are 3 × 4 = 12 size–repetitions combinations (if we had kept the original categories for repetitions, we would have 18 combinations). Examining a distribution across 12 subgroups can be difficult. Further, we come up against the problem of having too few observations in subgroups. Although, there are nearly 200 rows in the dogs data frame, half of the size–repetition combinations have 10 or fewer observations. (This is compounded by losing an observation when one feature has a missing value.) This “curse of dimensionality” also arises when we compare relationships with quantitative data. With just three quantitative variables, some of the scatter plots in a facet plot can easily have too few observations to confirm the shape of the relationship between two variables for the subgroups.

Now that we’ve seen practical examples of visualizations that are commonly used in exploratory data analysis, we proceed to discuss some high-level guidelines for EDA.